BY TANIA MELNYCZUK | UPDATED 19 MAY 2023
Introduction to ABA | Professional training in ABA | ABA-based methods | Ivar Lovaas and the origins of ABA | Academic issues in ABA | ABA, law and government | The #BanABA movement | Nonspeaking autistics’ experiences of ABA | Who is using ABA in South Africa? | A closing thought
CONTENT WARNING: Psychological and physical torture of disabled children and adults; seclusion, murder, communication deprivation, academic dehumanisation of autistic people.
Introduction to ABA
The “gold standard in autism treatment” is a behaviour modification method called Applied Behaviour Analysis, or ABA.
More accurately, ABA is an academic discipline based on a behaviourist belief-system with a variety of practical methods emanating from it. Colloquially, though, the methods themselves are collectively called ABA throughout the so-called “behavioural health” industry.
ABA assumes that “severely autistic” people are “developmentally delayed”, and that they lack the motivation or intelligence (or both) to behave “normally”.
To motivate autists to change their behaviour, and to teach them things they are assumed to not know, professionals called behaviour analysts and behaviour technicians drill children for hours per day using reinforcers such as sweets, stars on a chart or access to a favourite toy, and sometimes also by employing explicit punishments (called “aversives”). ABA is also used in an effort to teach life-skills, such as brushing teeth (although for many, this does not work).
Some ABA is done at home by parents themselves, replacing normal parent-child relationships.
The majority of autistic people who are aware of ABA do not support it, as it violates the UN Convention on the Rights of People With Disabilities (CRPD).
Professional training in ABA
Even though ABA is most often used with autistic children, most ABA training does not include training on autism. Some ABA professionals (such as Registered Behaviour Technicians) do one week of training before taking their exam. In America, an RBT works under the direction of a BCBA (Board Certified Behaviour Analyst). The “white bible” (the standard ABA textbook by Cooper et al) used to train BCBAs does not include anything about autism either.
South Africa does not have formal accredited training for ABA professionals. A new organisation in Africa aims to change this.
Ilana Gerschlowitz is the Managing Director of Star Academy, which delivers ABA services in several provinces in South Africa. They also work in other African countries. Ilana sees herself as a loving warrior mother waging a war against autism. In her book Saving My Sons, she explains how she has used ABA and other methods in her war. She also describes how she attempted to murder her son David and left him slumped on the floor, and how she learned to remove herself from the situation when she is tempted to murder him.
To understand ABA better, Ilana recommends searching the Internet for information on Ivar Lovaas, one of the “fathers” of ABA.
Ivar Lovaas and the origins of ABA
ABA as we know it today developed from B. F. Skinner’s operant conditioning model for animal training. Lovaas, Rekers and others used these principles and adapted them to create methods for dealing with LGBTQ+ and autistic children. George Rekers continued to refine the method as “conversion therapy” to “treat” LGBTQ+ people, while the same approaches honed for autistic people and others became commonly known as ABA.
Lovaas did not consider autistic children to be people until they had undergone his “therapy” to “build a person”. His treatment included electric shocks as punishment for behaving autistically. The following articles provide a glimpse into his work, including matter-of-fact accounts of torture and dehumanisation:
- Screams, Slaps & Love: A surprising, shocking treatment helps far-gone mental cripples
Life Magazine, 1965
- “After you hit a child, you can’t just get up and leave him; you are hooked to that kid”
Interview with Ivar Lovaas, Psychology Today, 1974
Although Lovaas later modified his approach, electric shocks are used as punishment at the Judge Rotenberg Center (JRC) in the USA as part of ABA to this day. ASAN and Neuroclastic (autistic-led organisations), ADAPT and other disability rights organisations protest against this abuse in an effort to have it stopped.
The JRC employs Board Certified Behaviour Analysts (BCBAs), accredited by the BACB (Behaviour Analyst Certification Board). While many behaviour analysts object to this type of torture (which violates several international treaties), it is not illegal in America, and BCBAs cannot lose their credential for torturing disabled people in this way. In fact, the founders of the JRC were instrumental in establishing the main professional organisations in the field of ABA. South African BCBAs who were trained abroad say that South Africa’s ABA practices could be improved if an organisation such as the BACB had a presence here.
Lovaas’ most famous study was ‘Behavioral Treatment and Normal Educational and Intellectual Functioning in Autistic Children’, published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology in 1987. Subsequent developments in Applied Behaviour Analysis for autism built on this foundation.
Based on the work of an earlier academic (Letter, 1967), Lovaas set targets for the little children in his study: “higher scores on IQ tests, communicative speech, and appropriate play”. To classic behaviourists, “appropriate play” means things like:
- pushing the car along the ground making sounds like “vroom vroom”, NOT spinning the wheels of a toy car held upside down
- dressing up and enacting social conventions with dolls, NOT lining up dolls by size or clothing colour
- winding up wind-up toys and letting them run, NOT dissembling them to understand how they work
Lovaas also decided to make the autistic children stop stimming (i.e., to stop the repetitive movements and sounds which autistic people make to regulate their emotions and bodies).
The targets were chosen based on his belief that it would be easier to make autistic people behave in ways which a judgemental society can accept, than it would be to try to get society to be less judgmemental. Ron Leaf and and John McEachin, who worked with him, still believe this today, and their ABA work reflects this. Lovaas and his associates also assumed that once the children attained the targets, they would have a better future.
Nowadays, targets for behaviour modification sometimes come from parents, e.g., “We want her to hug us and say ‘I love you’, and smile and look at the camera when we take her picture, and we want her to stop pulling her hoodie over her face when we go out.”
A consequence of everything being about “children with autism”: no one thinks about the adults. They desire desperately to make us indistinguishable from peers (using a very interesting definition) and then as soon as we meet that goal, we’re allbetternow. No one spares a thought for the adults who, years ago, were declared to have made the goal, hit the holy grail of “normal enough”.Kassiane Asasumasu (ABA survivor), The Tyranny of Indistinguishability: Performance
“Indistinguishable from their peers” is a phrase attributed to teachers who had Lovaas’ “successful” behaviourally-modified children in their classes. Today some behaviour analysts say they no longer try to make disabled children “indistinguishable from their peers”, while others see this as an important goal.
Children in Lovaas’ study were subjected to ABA for every waking hour for years. This included 40 hours per week of formal ‘therapy’, plus ABA-ified interactions with all the main people in their lives. (Parents were trained to interact with them in prescribed ways.) Although he no longer used electric shocks by this time, Lovaas did record in his study that the use of violence and shouting was essential for reaching his targets. (The researchers initially tried to do the experiment in a less cruel way, but it wasn’t effective.)
Fewer than half of Lovaas’ test subjects reached his targets, but since other methods were less successful, many people considered this an excellent result. In spite of being based on flawed assumptions, human rights violations and a disregard for the long-term psychological devastation of its victims, Lovaas’ work was peer-reviewed and evidence-based. (“Evidence-based” is one of the most popular slogans used by ABA promotors today.)
There has never been an endorsement of Lovaas’ goals, targets, methods or interpretation of the results by any group representing autistic people or by human rights groups.
Aversives are still widely used today, but much of modern ABA (and PBS particularly) relies on showing kindness and approval in exchange for the desired behaviour, while deliberately ignoring a disabled child’s distress signals, or paying attention to them only if they are expressed in the ways prescribed by the therapist. Some ABA practitioners working in schools will put a sign on the door saying that Planned Ignoring is in progress, so that other teachers will not come to the aid of children they hear screaming.
Children who continue to display distress are sometimes isolated in specially-built rooms or chambers. Restraint is routinely practiced in many ABA settings, and in some institutions, it is the first thing that staff learn to do to the disabled inmates. Some autistic people are restrained hundreds of times in their lives, and a few, like 8-year-old Max Benson, die from restraint. ICARS and AASR lobby against seclusion and restraint in partnership with other organisations.
Some CARD-trained ABA therapists will not allow nonspeaking children to use the signs or symbols for “no” or “stop”, so that they cannot object to anything done to them.
In short, children in Lovaas-inspired ABA learn that expressing their feelings in autistic ways is unacceptable, and will not be rewarded.
Academic issues in ABA
The Lovaas legacy continues in academia and beyond through the work of ABA experts such as Ron Leaf, who began his career working with Lovaas in 1973, and who has dedicated some of his most recent work to Lovaas. Leaf and his associates discourage the use of other therapies alongside ABA, stressing the importance of 40 hours per week of ABA drills from an early age. He says that he and his associates did their best work in the 1960s when inflicting physical pain was more accepted. Leaf and his colleagues say “recovery from autism” is possible when using their methods. In spite of being complicit in human rights violations, Leaf’s licence as a psychologist has never been revoked, and he continues to work with autistic people. His son, Justin, runs an organisation that does research and provides free training to candidates wanting to take the Registered Behaviour Technician (RBT) exam.
Thousands of other ABA studies have been conducted on autistic people (mostly children) since the time of Lovaas. Even modern studies include physical and psychological abuses, such as the withholding of food, and not allowing children to withdraw assent.
Besides the lack of endorsement by the community it supposedly serves, numerous other ethical and scientific issues have been raised against ABA by academics outside the field of Applied Behaviour Analysis.
Alfie Kohn has spent a good deal of his career explaining the conterproductivity of extrinsic motivation (a key characteristic of ABA), lack of choice, and boring uncontextual learning. In this interview, he explains why even positive reinforcement works to demotivate a learner and harms relationships with parents, therapists and teachers.
In a later Webinar along with Alfie Kohn, Dr. Elizabeth Torres explains how behaviourism, and ABA most notably, works against natural healthy childhood development. She points out also that an enormous body of ABA research (the so-called evidence base of this allegedly “evidence-based” method) violates the Declaration of Helsinki that is supposed to govern ethical research on humans worldwide.
Bemusingly, PACA (the Pan-African Congress on Autism, which has been instrumental in the establishment of the ABA organisation PAABA) said that they would check to ensure that submissions for their 2022 conference meet the criteria of Helsinki Declaration. Given that they also claim respect for the CRPD in their mission statement while repeatedly demonstrating contempt for this treaty, their statement in this regard should perhaps be taken with a bucketful of salt.
In 2016 the US government commissioned a large-scale study at the request of the Department of Defense (DoD) to determine the effectiveness of ABA. They did this because the DoD have to pay for therapy for the autistic children of their employees—over $23,000 per child per year, which adds up to more than $1.5 billion, given the number of children in the programme! The conclusion of the study was that ABA is not effective. In fact, many children were shown to be worse off for having had ABA, even by ableist measurement criteria. ABA providers were angry about the conclusion, and said that the study was not done properly. Dr. Barry R. Nathan explains why their objections are invalid.
Published in 2018, Dr. Henny Kupferstein’s frequently-cited study on PTSD symptoms in ABA survivors has been widely criticised, yet subsequent researchers have corroborated her findings.
Dr. Kristen Bottema-Beutel has published a series of studies showing widespread ethical problems with early intervention studies over many decades. These issues include a lack of adverse events tracking, a lack of informed consent, inadequate sample sizes, studies without control groups and numerous other issues. Her May 2021 study, co-authored by Shannon Crowley, is titled ‘Pervasive Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest in Applied Behavior Analysis Autism Literature‘.
Many ABA therapists claim that modern ABA is no longer harsh. In 2022, Ann Memmot achieved her Masters Degree with a dissertation titled ‘Ethics and Autism: Rights and Responsibilities within Applied Behaviour Analysis’, based on an analysis of “videos, ethics guidance papers, academic papers found in the top journal for ABA teams, and books aimed at teaching ABA teams about ABA”. What Ann found, inter alia, was that “the evidence in the papers pointed to routine use of punishment, and use of coercive or restrictive practice to achieve results.”
ABA, law and government
The practices that are now commonly called ABA were originally developed to transform LGBTQ+ people into cisgender heterosexual people, starting at an early age when children display gender non-conforming behaviour. In some parts of the USA, Australia and other regions, it is no longer legal to use ABA for this purpose. However, ABA has not yet been banned for use against autistic people. In some countries, such as the USA, the government pays for autistic children to undergo ABA, and parents may even by forced to keep their children in ABA, as described in this first-hand account. In the USA alone, the ABA industry rakes in more than 17 billion dollars per year, and is expanding even further with the support of Autism Speaks.
The #BanABA movement
Needless to say, ABA is not supported by the majority of autistic people, as it violates the UN Convention on the Rights of People With Disabilities. There are online peer support groups for ABA survivors, and some therapists offer rehabilitation and counselling services for children as well as adult survivors. Some of these counsellors are ex-ABA practitioners who saw the harm in what they were doing.
Autistic human rights activist Ruti Regan explains how this makes ABA, even in its ‘gentle’ forms, different from typical parenting. Some forms of ABA are used in corporate change management, sports coaching, and other fields. The ABA industry is expanding among elderly institutionalised people, children with ADHD and ‘troubled children’.
A few autistic people voluntarily undergo ABA to acquire new habits, but compared to the numbers who undergo ABA as forced compliance, this is rare.
The hashtag #BanABA was first used by Dr. Henny Kupferstein who studied trauma in ABA survivors. There is now a global movement to ban ABA, with activists lobbying government in the US, Canada, UK, South Africa, New Zealand and Australia, and awareness campaigns on other countries.
In South Africa, the #BanABA movement has support from the Council for Counsellors and many parents and allied health professionals. ABA has not yet been banned in South Africa, even though a bill has been tabled to ban conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ youth, in line with the Constitution. Because of growing respect for the views of ABA survivors, we expect that South Africa will be among the first countries to have nonconsensual ABA declared unlawful for autistic children and adults.
The ABA counter-revolution
The uprising against ABA has led some ABA providers to try to placate autistic people by appropriating the language and symbols of the neurodiversity movement and other mollifying jargon. Terms like “play-based ABA”, “trauma-informed ABA”, “neuro-affirming ABA” and even “rights-based ABA” are used in ABA marketing now. In a 2021 paper, Leaf et al. (Lovaas’ collaborators) said that they “support neurodiversity”, whilst advocating for the same hardcore treatments they’ve espoused all along, including the use of harsh aversives!
Some nonprofit organisations that help to promote ABA among other activities co-opt an autistic “ambassador”. The ambassador is typically a person who has never collaborated with nonspeaking activists or ABA survivors, and who does not understand their needs and concerns. Ambassadors’ activities are seldom directly related to ABA, but function more as an autistic endorsement of the organisation, and by implication of its ideals and its practices.
There are also a few autistic ABA therapists who work with nonspeakers who do not pay attention to what nonspeaking writers say about their communication needs.
A handful of autistic BCBAs have tried hard to get electric shocks condemned by their professional peers.
Non-speaking autistics’ experiences of ABA
Emerging evidence shows that apraxia is the primary reason why many autistic people either don’t speak at all, or do not speak reliably or effectively.
Autistic people who have apraxia struggle with purposeful movement. This means that they will struggle to execute even the babyish tasks given to them by behaviour analysts, while those who have fewer movement problems may become more adept at faking normal and developing the responses which parents and therapists deem necessary. Nonspeaking author Ido Kedar (also quoted below) elucidates this discrepancy based on his experience.
See also: Six Things You Should Know About Apraxia
While there are many accounts of the traumatic effects of ABA written by autistic people who speak well, the present article features only the writing of non-speaking autistics. Their words are significant, because the more disabled and apraxic the individual, the more likely they are to be targeted with ABA.
40 hours a week of touching flashcards won’t help a toddler who may have an inability to focus visually, or hear speech distinctly in a sea of sounds, or be able to move the way he wants, to gain the sensory control or muscle control he needs to be able to communicate or show his intelligence. That’s because ABA believes autism is a severe learning disability that is treated by drills, rewards and baby talk. This makes recognition of the motor challenges nearly impossible because all the data from the child’s success in performing the drills is interpreted as a measure of how much the child understands speech, and not of whether the child can get his body to move correctly. Therefore if a child is told to jump and he doesn’t jump because he can’t get his body to move at that moment in that way, his failure is chalked up to a lack of understanding the word ‘jump’ even if he damn-well understands the word ‘jump’ and everything else. To interpret data solely based on the belief that a person’s actions are an accurate reflection of their comprehension of speech, leaves out the possibility of helping this motor trapped person address his real needs.
As someone who has had every sort of treatment thrown at them, I say don’t do any of these things! No child should be in 40 hours of therapy like I was. The most effective thing my parents did was to join me in cutting paper and the things I loved to do. It was the only way I knew to connect with the outside world. All the rest of it was irrelevant. Understanding that your child experiences the world very differently from you is the first step towards acceptance.
Sometimes I wonder what my childhood would have been like had I just been allowed to be able to do my own thing. Stopping my behaviors was the wrong way to go. Fortunately, I’m a pretty patient guy.
Some recommend up to 40 hours per week of this “therapy”, which consists of commands an Autistic child must follow to exhaustion, responses an Autistic child must give “correctly”, even if the answers don’t match the child’s feelings or preferences, and the repression of movements that Autistics use to regulate their own bodies.
Besides this extreme regimen, the “experts” insist that parents use the same tactics at home.
So, parents pay a lot of money to people who don’t allow Autistics to experience growth, and the world, the Autistic way. They pay for abuse.
Parents are made to feel guilty and encouraged to force their children into molds that were not made for them.
Autistic children are not allowed to be themselves, being forced instead, to learn how to pretend, never learning self-determination, never allowed to have an independent thought.
Not surprisingly, the majority of ABA proponents are making a lot of money by stealing the childhood of Autistic children. 40 hours/week of drills, plus homework, the children don’t experience their own personal development.
This is considered abuse, if done to non-autistics. And then we have to hear that WE cost too much money.
Wrong: ABA therapists cost too much money. Take them out of our lives, let Autistic children be children. Let Autistics develop in our own time, learning about ourselves, learning self-determination.
I can hear the apologists:
“My ABA is not like that.”
If you bill ABA prices, if you want to change how an Autistic acts, reacts, or interacts with the world, and your ideal model is a neurotypical type of behavior, your ABA is as bad as I described it.
“My child loves it.”
How would you know, if she is not allowed to have her own thoughts? The word “no”, or refusal to comply with the therapist’s commands, are not allowed.
Another reason is that children do learn to fake in order to please. That is, after all, what ABA defines as success: obedient pleasers. It is not enjoyment, pleasant or something to look forward to.
Yes, some children might show enjoyment in some moments, but I did too, when I got my cookie for looking at the therapist. I wanted that cookie, I briefly looked at her, I got my wish. You could say that, at that moment, I “loved it”.
“It is not as bad as you think.”
Yes it is. Putting children through unending hours of training, not allowing them to be who they are, forcing an experience of the world we Autistics can never naturally have, and stating how not good enough we are to everyone else is pretty bad. It is abusive. It is disrespectful.
“Autistic children need to learn certain skills.”
All children do. Respectful approaches don’t cause trauma and value our essence. It does not imply we are broken.
All children make mistakes and they have a chance to learn, they are kindly guided and taught. But to ABA proponents, Autistic children (and Autistic adults) are not allowed to err, or they are forever labeled a failure, or abused until they “get it right”.
I had some ABA when I was young, and I “flunked”. I want to say, I am proud of this “F” in my life.
Of course, the “experts” explanation for having failed to make me into a “tidy”, “appropriate”, “good girl”, obedient and compliant Autistic was my severe impairment, my extreme low IQ, my inability to learn or, as Lovaas would probably have said (and something a doctor actually said), my lack of human dignity.
I prefer my own assessment: if you want something from me, if you want me to do something, respect who I am, respect my way of doing things, listen to me and allow me to disagree and to find my own way.
ABA rejects all of this and that’s why I failed it.
I am, though, a very disabled Autistic who needs a lot of support, but who is completely independent in what I believe matters most: my thinking, my ideas, my decisions, my identity.
I am completely distinguishable from my peers, and proudly so.
I am free to say “no” when I see fit. And I do.
As an autistic boy, I want you to know I am happy. My autistic neurology makes me think very differently than most people. I can sense the world keenly, making me a very observant person. People make wrong assumptions about people who don’t act like a typical person. Making assumptions about something as important as your child is dangerous if you make the wrong conclusions. I have lived the consequences of my parents’ wrong assumptions. Being thought as retarded and in need of remedial education assigned me to many years of ABA and useless therapies based on neurotypical assumptions of autism. Man assumes many things they don’t really know. The best way to know someone is to hear from them personally. The only way to hear from me has been through RPM (Rapid Prompting Method). I think most autistic people can make use of assistive means to communicate. Parents should look into learning more communication methods. Body awareness programs would also help a lot. My parents have done a lot of therapies. Making life as normal as possible and helping us to communicate is what makes the biggest difference in our lives. Please teach us interesting things. Don’t just address the things you want to fix. Accept us the same way you want to be accepted yourself. Mainly, maintain an attitude of love and patience towards us. Making us feel loved is an essential part of helping us meet the challenges of living in this world.
I was treated with mostly kindness, but the therapists could not see beyond their training. I learn quickly, but am not able to reply with words that sound right to another.
Worry becomes everyone’s focus.
Real learning happens when no one notices.
The goals waste away.
Tender feelings do not hurt, but are not helpful because they cannot soothe wounds of being constantly underestimated.
We did ABA (applied behaviour analysis) for a short time before we worked out how terrible it is. Autism can’t be cured, and you can’t train us like dogs. What the ABA people are missing is that autism is neurological and that we are whole people with no pieces missing. They presume incompetence.
There were nearly a dozen nonspeakers in an official consultation on Canadian autism policy. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US just tore into ABA. Kids, adults, teens, all of us just explaining how awful and harmful it is. …not sure they believed us.
I think it was the severity of my behaviors that led teachers to treat me like I couldn’t understand anything more than basic English. People looked at data and made assumptions that were wrong, but hard to debunk. Teachers would make promises about things they were going to do that usually went unfulfilled. At 18 years old I was being told to touch my nose and touch my head, then subsequently given candy for complying.
The following account is different in that Jay Jay is no longer nonspeaking.
I was in ABA for about twelve years, beginning around age four; it got less and less around my teenage years and eventually fully stopped around age 14. I can firmly say that ABA stole my childhood, and the resulting (professionally diagnosed) complex post-traumatic stress disorder stole my adulthood. ABA groomed me for every trauma I endured later in my life, from abusive relationships in my adult years where I was physically and mentally injured by partners, to being molested for seven years, starting at six years old, by my uncle.
I was nonspeaking until I was 12. I understood language, and I consider poetry my first language—it was a special interest at the time I was nonspeaking and remains one to this day—but my lack of verbal-vocal speech was a motor function trouble. ABA, quite literally, starved words out of me. Around age 12, it was decided by the behavior therapists who were doing ABA to me that I was a “big girl” who needed to ask for food. They decided food would be a motivator for me, as if I needed motivation to speak rather than needing help strengthening my muscles, motor planning skills, or moving my body intentionally. My two guaranteed meals were at school as I grew up pretty poor, and it was written into my behavior plan by the people traumatizing me that I needed to ask to be fed—the nonspeaking child needs to ask. I related this story to a BCBA recently who had told me that ABA had changed; her response was, “well, it worked.” I feel this anecdote demonstrates the fundamental cruelty of ABA.
I say ABA groomed me for my traumas because I believe that ABA and the existential torture that Autists are forced to endure via ABA is fundamentally child grooming. … [ABA] forces the Autistic to endure fear and pain while suppressing outwards signs of it like crying, vomiting, eloping, covering ears, or flapping. Once the outward signs of distress are gone, ABA claims that the distress is gone. By the time my uncle began molesting me, ABA had taught me, through the way it forced me to endure pain for the comfort of others, that my body was not my own. When my uncle came to my room at night to molest me, the first thought in my child-mind was that this was the same thing as therapy, that if I was quiet and kept my body still, it will be over quicker than if I fought—because I learned that in ABA as well. When my first partner began hitting me when I was 18 through 20-something, I was convinced it was something to do with me, as if I was a bad or broken person who deserved it. ABA had taught me that the people who purport to love you will hurt you, and with the same breath, say they have your best interests at heart.
Who is using ABA in South Africa?
While some are vehemently against ABA, many autism schools, therapy centres and independent therapists in South Africa provide ABA services or incorporate ABA principles in their approach. Descriptions such as “ABA grounded” and “ABA based” are common, showing that these service providers see ABA as a positive selling point. Approaches that align to the nihil de nobis sine nobis principle embodied in the CRPD are seen to be unimportant. Simply put, many service providers don’t think they should be led by what actual autistic people say harms them or helps them.
ASAP Autism in Somerset West and Amazing K Autism School in Johannesburg emphasise ABA in their marketing.
SNAP (based in Durbanville) provides one-to-one ABA as one of their services, and use a variety of other ABA-based approaches (including PECS) in their work.
Els for Autism focuses largely on providing ABA services, emphasising the need to start as early as possible.
REACH Autism and Luc Academy both employ ABA in their work. The parents who lead these companies have also used chlorine dioxide on their children and encouraged others to do so.
Using chlorine dioxide on children is both harmful and illegal. The chemical, also referred to as CD and sold as MMS, is administered to autistic children by means of a rubber hose up the anus to force it into the intestines. It is also squirted into other orifices and sometimes into the eyes. The belief is that this will cure the children of mythical lifeforms called ropeworms that breed at full moon and cause autism. People who ascribe to these quasi-religious beliefs ironically refer to symptoms of chlorine dioxide poisoning as “signs of detox”. None of the South African perpetrators who have confessed to these crimes have yet been convicted. They continue to work with children using ABA. A few CD/MMS sellers have been arrested in other countries, but tens of thousands of sellers and users are still at large. While it is common for MMS believers to use ABA, the reverse is not true; most ABA practitioners do not believe in the existence of ropeworms, and discourage the use of chlorine dioxide.
Star Academy is one of the most expensive ABA schools in South Africa and has several branches. Therapists at Star are trained according to the CARD model of ABA. (Some of the parents whose children attend Star Academy have also used chlorine dioxide on their children, but it is unclear how prevalent this is among the rest of the families. Therapists and parents who were asked have declined to comment.)
The founder of Star Academy, Ilana Gerschlowitz, also runs an ABA-based programme called Catch-Up-Kids.
AIMS Global does not use ABA, but requires that its therapists be trained in ABA, and recruits them accordingly. They also make it clear to clients that their therapists are ABA-trained, and (perhaps because of this ambiguous marketing), some AIMS therapists report that parents expect them to ‘fix’ their children. The founder of AIMS, Karla Pretorius, also says that ABA experience is important for dealing with children who are aggressive. (Many former ABA practitioners who have denounced ABA disagree.)
Newberry Park (also known as Child Behaviour Consultants), says, “We specialize in providing highly individualized 1-on-1 and group interventions. ABA is the only intervention with more than 50 years of scientific evidence and is seen as an effective treatment of ASD.” They defer to the BACB.
Blossom Interventions similarly uses an ABA hashtag in their marketing, and says that “we are previously trained in ABA; however we do not fully apply it in therapy anymore. We prefer using a combination approach that ensures we deliver customised strategies for every child.”
In 2023, the Johannesburg-based Adult Programme for People with Autism advertised a position for “a Facilitator with an understanding of ABA and other relevant Autism specific programmes who will implement our day enrichment programme and work with our adults with Autism”.
Many other schools, therapists and other professionals use ABA in some form when working with autistic children.
Some organisations, such as the Neurodiversity Centre in Paarl, partner with ABA organisations on projects even though they do not support ABA themselves.
Incredible Minds Adaptive Learning Centre in Durban will not collaborate with anyone who does ABA.
The Sisu Hub, which has schools in Gauteng, likewise do not support ABA.
Some clinical professionals (such as Speech & Language Therapists and Occupational Therapists) do not publicly declare their opposition to ABA, as they are concerned that they may not receive referrals if they do so, or that they may lose existing clients who are in ABA. Others have found that being outspoken against ABA has gained them the trust of parents who seek solutions for their children that autistic people themselves support.
A closing thought
The first non-speaking author quoted above, Ido Kedar, learned to communicate his thoughts via a letterboard, as did a number of the others quoted here. The letterboard is held in position by a parent, therapist or aide. In the early stages of learning, there may be a lot of prompting to develop accuracy of movement, hence the name Rapid Prompting Method. Some newer methods, such as Spelling to Communicate (S2C) and the Spellers Method also make use of letterboards. Prompts fade as the autistic client perfects their skill.
Ido has been the victim of scathing attacks by promotors of ABA. One of them claimed that his words were not his own, but that he was trained like a horse to merely appear clever. Ido realised that these invalidations would continue to plague him unless he developed the ability to type independently, which he eventually did with the help of a therapist.
To this day, though, disabled people like Ido who have high support needs are silenced by powerful people in the multi-billion dollar “behavioural health industry” (as investors call it) and by well-meaning therapists, parents and teachers who fall for ABA and become its foot-soldiers.
Published in 2021, ‘The Lancet Commission on the future of care and clinical research in autism’ is an example of the kind of prejudice which nonspeakers face daily. It is an academic paper proposing what to do about people with “profound autism” (the authors’ term for people like William, Akha, Amy and other nonspeakers quoted above). The paper was strongly influenced by the ABA lobby, including the Semel Institute at UCLA, who regard themselves as heirs of Lovaas. It mentions Applied Behaviour Analysis many times, culminating in a recommendation. The Lancet paper is now being used by some countries to design policies to govern the lives of autistic people with high support needs. Prof. Petrus de Vries, an autism researcher from South Africa, contributed to the paper. Prof. de Vries encourages young people to join the ABA industry. While on tour with Els for Autism, he told his audience that there is a lot of money to be made as well.
Many people never imagine that non-speaking autistic people may have something to say, and prize the few nonsensical words that emit from their mouths whilst refusing to believe that something very different and far richer lies within.
Human dignity does not reside in the ability to make eye contact, to move fluidly, to speak, or to live alone.
Human dignity most certainly does not reside in speaking over non-speakers in defense of ABA.